top of page
Search

Has the Federal Court Jurisdiction in Honours and Awards Decisions ?

  • Dec 8, 2013
  • 2 min read

ON THE QUESTION OF JURISDICTION

1. We submit that there are (at least) two bases for the Federal Court’s jurisdiction in these matters: (1) the ADJR Act and (2) the Judiciary Act. The Applicant invokes both avenues, in that order of preference.

Background

2. The Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal (DHAAT) Fact Sheet 05 explains three important matters:

a. The DHAAT is established under the Defence Act 1903 ...

b. There are strict rules governing eligibility for awards ...

c. An applicant is able to seek review by the Federal Court on questions of law, but not on the merits ...

Administrative Decisions Judicial Review Act

3. The ADJR Act provides for judicial review jurisdiction in respect of decisions of an administrative character made under an enactment.

4. The determination of the DHAAT is a “decision”, namely a decision as to eligibility for an honour or award.

5. The determination is of an “administrative character”, being the consideration of relevant facts and their relationship to fixed criteria, namely “strict rules” governing eligibility.

6. The determination is made “under an enactment”, namely the Defence Act 1903, which establishes the DHAAT.

7. As a result, the Federal Court has jurisdiction to review the legality of the DHAAT determination.

Judiciary Act 1903 s 39B(1)

8. The above sub-section of the Judiciary Act provides for review jurisdiction, inter alia, where certiorari is sought against an “officer of the Commonwealth”.

9. Tribunal members occupy an “office”, namely the office of Members by way of appointment, with the provision of salary, to a Tribunal established under a Commonwealth Act.

10. Tribunal members are therefore “officers of the Commonwealth”.

11. Alternatively, the original determination by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs was made by an employee of the Department, being an “officer of the Commonwealth”.

12. As a result, the Federal Court has jurisdiction to review the legality of the DHAAT determination !


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Australia Day Award

In 2015 our Principal Dino De Marchi was given recognition for his work with the Ivanhoe RSL. He was granted an Australia Day Certificate...

 
 
 
Watkins v Repatriation Commission

A Special rate decision supported by the Federal Court. was later overturned by the full Court. Bromberg J. delivered his decision on the...

 
 
 

1 Comment


sryjaertjsryjsry
Sep 13, 2023

Nike Air Max Tn Requin Foot Locker,Nike Tn Pas Cher Air Max Tn Requin Homme,Nike Air Max Tn Requin/Tuned 1 2014.

Nike Tn Air Tn Requin,Nike Air Tn Requin Homme,Nike Requin Tn Fff.

Like

De Marchi and Associates

PO Box 141 Brunswick Vic 3056

AUSTRALIA

Phone: +61 3 9387 7833

Fax: +61 3 93872125

Mob: +61 418584091

Email: ddemarchi44@gmail.com

387 Sydney Road

Brunswick, VIC 3056

De Marchi and Associates Barristers and Solicitors official website. Our office is located in Brunswick, and we offer services in many areas of law including Italian law,Veterans Affairs and Mediation.

bottom of page